Evidence rests at the heart of nearly ever small court case involving injury. Who is responsible for the injury at work? The employer could be held responsible, but that is not the de facto answer. There are other moving pieces. Was the employee acting incompetently during the injury? Was there another employee present who caused the injury?
Unfortunately, no one is going to admit the truth and no one is going to step forward and take full responsibility. If they do, it is because they just want to move on. Construction Accident Lawyers Edison NJ build evidence to support any claim made by the client, and that will make a case successful or make it fall flat on the ground as soon as the paperwork is delivered.
Well-Rounded Evidence
The evidence should not hang on one item. This is true whether it is a testimony from a witness or a video report. There should always be a selection of evidence that helps hang the case because nothing is ever set in stone. The video footage could have been received unlawfully, which would invalidate it in the court. The witness could be shown to be untrustworthy, and the prosecution will likely look into their background and history at the company. Construction Accident Lawyers Edison NJ seeks evidence from multiple sources for the possibility of one piece of evidence falling apart. Browse here for more information.
Targeting the One Responsible
Unfortunately, it may not be easy for the Construction Accident Lawyers Edison NJ to determine who is responsible. Work sites incorporate different types of employees at different times. The evidence should be sought to specifically target who the attorney finds most likely to be responsible.
Before any lawful action is taken by Harrell Smith & Williiams LLC, the evidence needs to be established. There should be, at the least, a strong idea of where the evidence is going to come from. For example, there may be a witness in mind. That may be enough to set forward a course of action with a slip and fall attorney. In the end, raw evidence or a suggestion of evidence needs to be possible, or the case will never get off the ground.
